How Well Does Your Robot Vacuum Avoid Getting Stuck On Objects?

All respondents

All answers:

Letters A, B, C, D and E refer to the following answers in all of this page's graphs:

  • A. Excellent obstacle avoidance
  • B. Good obstacle avoidance
  • C. Neutral
  • D. Occasionally gets stuck
  • E. Frequently gets stuck
  • X is the number of 'N/A' or not applicable.

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results

    • 25% of homeowners reported excellent obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 35% of homeowners rated their robot vacuum's obstacle avoidance as good.
    • 14% of homeowners had a neutral stance on their robot vacuum's ability to avoid getting stuck on objects.
    • 16% of homeowners stated that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck.
    • 10% of homeowners claimed that their robot vacuum frequently gets stuck.

    Age analysis

    Ages from 25 to 34:

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results:

    • Age group 34 to 43 has the highest percentage (42%) of respondents with excellent obstacle avoidance.
    • The majority of respondents across all age groups rated the robot vacuum's obstacle avoidance as either good or excellent.
    • Age group 61 to 70 has the highest percentage (23%) of respondents who frequently experience their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects.
    • Neutral ratings were relatively consistent across different age groups, ranging from 9% to 33%.

    Insights from this part of the survey:

    Based on the survey results, it is evident that most users find their robot vacuums to have satisfactory or above-average obstacle avoidance capabilities. The age group 34 to 43 seems to have the best-performing robot vacuums, with a high percentage of respondents rating them as excellent in avoiding obstacles.

    On the other hand, the age group 61 to 70 appears to face more challenges, experiencing their robot vacuums frequently getting stuck.

    Explanation and suggestions:

    Please consider a few factors that might contribute to the differences observed in the survey results. Firstly, technology advancements and improvements in robot vacuum design could explain the higher ratings in the younger age group.

    Manufacturers may have prioritized obstacle avoidance features in recent models, which are reflected in the survey's outcomes.

    Secondly, the higher frequency of robot vacuums getting stuck for the older age group might be due to various factors. The placement and number of obstacles in their homes could differ from younger respondents' living environments.

    Additionally, older individuals might have more intricate furniture layouts or specific challenges that impact the robot vacuum's performance.

    It could also be possible that some respondents in this age group might need assistance in operating or maintaining their robot vacuums properly, which affects the device's ability to avoid obstacles effectively.

    To address these variances and provide better obstacle avoidance across all age groups, manufacturers can consider a few suggestions. Firstly, they could invest in research and development to design robot vacuums that are capable of handling a wider range of obstacles efficiently.

    Additionally, including user-friendly instructions and troubleshooting guides specifically tailored for older users can help them navigate and troubleshoot potential problems.

    Moreover, manufacturers can encourage users to customize their robot vacuums' settings based on their home environments, allowing them to set preferences for obstacle avoidance and providing options for customization.

    This way, users can adjust the robot's behaviors to adapt to different living spaces and increase its effectiveness in avoiding obstacles.

    Ages from 34 to 43:

    Male versus female

    Male respondents:

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results

    • Approximately 21% of male respondents reported excellent obstacle avoidance.
    • Around 33% of male respondents stated good obstacle avoidance.
    • About 26% of male respondents mentioned their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck.
    • About 28% of female respondents reported excellent obstacle avoidance.
    • Approximately 37% of female respondents stated good obstacle avoidance.

    Insights from this part of the survey

    Looking at the data, it is evident that both male and female respondents have generally positive experiences with their robot vacuums' obstacle avoidance capabilities. A significant proportion of male respondents report excellent and good obstacle avoidance (21% and 33% respectively), slightly more compared to female respondents who report similar experiences (28% and 37% respectively).

    Interestingly, a smaller percentage of male respondents (26%) mention that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck, compared to female respondents (9%). This indicates that male users might have selected robot vacuums that have better design features or obstacle detection mechanisms.

    Explanation and Suggestions

    Based on the survey results, it seems that both male and female users generally find their robot vacuums to be efficient in avoiding obstacles. This is a positive indication that manufacturers have made strides in improving the obstacle detection technology in their products.

    For users whose robot vacuums occasionally get stuck, it might be beneficial to investigate the reasons behind the obstruction. This could involve ensuring the floor is clear of loose objects, cords, or other potential hazards that may impede the vacuum's progress.

    Considering that a few respondents reported neutral experiences with obstacle avoidance, it may suggest that further enhancements can be made by manufacturers to improve this aspect of robot vacuums.

    This could involve incorporating advanced sensors and AI algorithms to allow the vacuums to navigate their surroundings even more efficiently.

    Comparison of obstacle avoidance between male and female respondents
    Excellent obstacle avoidanceGood obstacle avoidanceOccasionally gets stuck
    Male respondents21%33%26%
    Female respondents28%37%9%

    Female respondents:

    'Middle income individual or household' versus 'high income individual or household'

    Middle income individual or household:

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results

    • 23% of middle-income individuals or households reported excellent obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 39% of middle-income individuals or households reported good obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 16% of middle-income individuals or households reported that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck on objects.
    • 7% of middle-income individuals or households reported that their robot vacuum frequently gets stuck on objects.
    • No middle-income individual or household reported N/A for obstacle avoidance.
    • 27% of high-income individuals or households reported excellent obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 32% of high-income individuals or households reported good obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 16% of high-income individuals or households reported that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck on objects.
    • 13% of high-income individuals or households reported that their robot vacuum frequently gets stuck on objects.
    • No high-income individual or household reported N/A for obstacle avoidance.

    Insights from this part of the survey

    The survey results reveal that a significant percentage of both middle-income and high-income individuals or households find their robot vacuum's obstacle avoidance to be either excellent or good. Specifically, 62% of middle-income respondents and 59% of high-income respondents are satisfied with their robot vacuum's ability to avoid getting stuck.

    However, it is concerning that 16% of middle-income respondents and 19% of high-income respondents mentioned that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck.

    Explanation and suggestions

    It is interesting to note that a higher percentage of high-income individuals or households reported excellent obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum compared to middle-income respondents. This discrepancy might be attributed to the fact that high-income households are more likely to invest in advanced robot vacuum models that come with enhanced sensors and obstacle detection capabilities.

    For middle-income individuals or households who reported occasional or frequent getting stuck issues with their robot vacuums, please consider potential reasons behind this. It is possible that the robot vacuums they own are older models with limited obstacle avoidance features.

    In such cases, upgrading to a newer model with improved technology may greatly minimize the possibility of getting stuck on objects.

    Moreover, for those who fall under the excellent or good obstacle avoidance category, it is still crucial to regularly maintain and clear the cleaning path of the robot vacuum. Even with advanced features, there can be instances where unexpected objects or clutter obstruct the vacuum's movement.

    By keeping the cleaning area clear of potential obstacles, users can maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of their robot vacuum.

    High income individual or household:

    'Has allergies and / or asthma' versus 'does not have any allergies'

    Has allergies and / or asthma:

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results

    • 33% of respondents with allergies and/or asthma reported excellent obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 28% of these respondents reported good obstacle avoidance.
    • Only 11% of them frequently experienced their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects.
    • 44% of respondents without any allergies reported good obstacle avoidance from their robot vacuum.
    • 21% of these respondents occasionally faced their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects.

    Insights from this part of the survey

    It is interesting to note that a significant percentage (33%) of respondents with allergies and/or asthma mentioned excellent obstacle avoidance by their robot vacuum. This indicates that the device is adept at detecting and avoiding obstacles, providing a hassle-free cleaning experience for individuals with respiratory issues.

    Another substantial portion (28%) found the obstacle avoidance to be good, reinforcing the reliability of robot vacuums in maneuvering around their surroundings.

    Furthermore, only 11% of respondents with allergies and/or asthma reported frequent instances of their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects. This suggests that most robot vacuums in this demographic successfully navigate through various obstacles, ensuring efficient cleaning without frequent interruptions.

    In contrast, among respondents without any allergies, 44% perceived their robot vacuum's obstacle avoidance as good. Although this percentage is higher than that of respondents with allergies and/or asthma, it indicates that robot vacuums can effectively navigate obstacles for individuals without respiratory issues as well.

    However, it seems that individuals without allergies face slightly more instances of their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects. Around 21% occasionally experience this issue, implying that there might be room for improvement in terms of obstacle detection and avoidance for robot vacuums serving this demographic.

    Explanation and suggestions

    From the survey results, it is evident that most respondents, regardless of their allergy status, perceive their robot vacuums to have at least good obstacle avoidance capabilities. This is encouraging, as it underscores the effectiveness of these devices in navigating and cleaning different areas of the house.

    For individuals with allergies and/or asthma, the high percentage of respondents (33%) reporting excellent obstacle avoidance is particularly significant. This implies that robot vacuums can play a crucial role in maintaining a clean and allergen-free environment for such individuals, helping alleviate their symptoms.

    However, given that a small portion of respondents (11%) still encounter frequent issues with their robot vacuum getting stuck on objects, it might be beneficial for manufacturers to focus on refining the obstacle detection and avoidance systems further.

    Enhancing the robot vacuum's ability to identify obstructions accurately can contribute to a seamless cleaning experience, reducing interruptions and ensuring more efficient cleaning.

    As for respondents without allergies, while the majority find their robot vacuum's obstacle avoidance to be good, the number of instances where the device gets stuck on objects (21%) could be improved.

    Manufacturers should consider investing in research and development to enhance the robot vacuum's ability to navigate effectively without getting caught on various obstacles, ultimately leading to a smoother cleaning process.

    Does not have any allergies:

    Pet Owner versus 'does not have a pet'

    Pet Owner:

    Key Takeaways from Survey Results

    • Among pet owners, 25% reported excellent obstacle avoidance of their robot vacuum.
    • 32% of pet owners stated that their robot vacuum had good obstacle avoidance.
    • 13% of pet owners were neutral about their robot vacuum's ability to avoid getting stuck on objects.
    • 17% of pet owners mentioned that their robot vacuum occasionally gets stuck.
    • 13% of pet owners expressed that their robot vacuum frequently gets stuck on objects.

    Insights from this part of the survey

    The survey results reveal interesting insights about the performance of robot vacuums in terms of avoiding getting stuck on objects. Among pet owners, roughly a quarter (25%) reported excellent obstacle avoidance, indicating that their robot vacuums demonstrated impressive capabilities in navigating around obstacles.

    Additionally, a notable percentage of pet owners (32%) indicated good obstacle avoidance, further suggesting that a fair number of these robot vacuums are adequately equipped to handle obstacles.

    On the other hand, there were respondents (13%) who expressed a neutral stance, implying that they do not have a strong opinion either way regarding their robot vacuum's ability to avoid getting stuck.

    This suggests that there may be some room for improvement in terms of obstacle avoidance technology in a portion of robot vacuums.

    Furthermore, a considerable proportion of pet owners (17%) revealed that their robot vacuums occasionally get stuck on objects. While not a majority, this percentage represents a significant number of individuals who face this issue, indicating that there is still work to be done in enhancing obstacle avoidance in some robot vacuum models.

    Lastly, approximately 13% of the pet owners participating in the survey reported that their robot vacuums frequently get stuck. This reveals a need for improvements in obstacle avoidance technology for this subset of robot vacuums, as it appears that their performance in navigating around obstacles may not be up to par.

    Does not have a pet:

    The complete survey and the other results

    You can find the complete survey results, methodology and limitations here:

    Robot vacuum survey

    Did you find this article useful? I bet others will too.

    Share on…